AI startups ship agents that "work" in a demo — then break in production with no way to prove which change caused what. We built the missing piece: a repeatable evaluation loop with memory, one that gets smarter between runs instead of re-testing the same cases forever.
The standard failure in agentic software:
The missing piece isn't another model. It's a repeatable evaluation loop with memory — one that gets smarter between runs instead of re-testing the same cases forever.
| Component | What it does |
|---|---|
| Eval suite | Repeatable test cases per agent workflow — happy path + edge cases + failure modes |
| Regression gate | Every change re-runs the suite; a regression blocks the merge instead of reaching production |
| Postmortem loop | Every failed run writes a structured lesson — stream, run id, output, suspected cause, next-run change |
| Memory | The harness reads past lessons before each run, so a recurring failure gets its approach reworked — never blindly re-run |
| Stale-run review | A stream that fails N runs in a row is flagged for rework, not silently killed or ignored |
| Frozen anchors | Hard constraints (no auto-send, no auto-spend, no auto-publish) that the loop can never tune or weaken |
Runs on a schedule. Each tick:
The loop optimizes the whole portfolio over many ticks — not one run's win rate. Verdicts require multiple data points; nobody kills or retunes a stream on one bad tick.
"If your agent works but you can't prove it, it doesn't — yet."
Tell us which agent workflow is the riskiest to break. We'll instrument it, wire the gate into your CI, and hand you a harness that remembers.
Book a strategy call →